DIY Audio Projects Forum

I agree. With the big dollars spent for premium 300B tubes and exotic coupling caps a mono approach seems like a logical choice and really won't add much cost and you get better objective performance (lower crosstalk).

A dual mono build does not have to be mono-blocks per say. You can have dual power supplies but in a stereo chassis since the driver tube is shared.
Cheers

_________________
[ DIY Mains AC Power Cable Cord ] - [ Gobo LM1875 Amp Kit ] - [ Tang Band D4-1 Horn Speaker Kit ] - [ Monoblock Push-Pull KT88 Tube Amp Kit ]

Given the nature of the project, you could go with Jensens. I just can't bring myself to recommend anything more expensive.

I won't tell you what we in the the advanced fighter avionics world have found to be the best capacitor in terms of noise, ESR, reliability, repeatability, and overall quality. You'd be shocked.

_________________
Matt
It's all about the Glass!
http://www.CascadeTubes.com
Cascade Tubes Blog

Mate, top suggestion. I have a draw full of motor starts and have been busting to find an amp I can use them on. I know we may be setting some high working voltages with this amp so I'll have to take a close a look at there V rating.

The Mundorfs 100uf 500V are perfect too. All great suggestions. Love it.

Matt: Please check the Mundies in the post above. Im looking at the 550V 100uf units. I think I only need one after the choke with a 30uf motor start prior(?). Is it OK to order these while the Auzzie dollar is good. Would you suggest bigger e.g. 200uf for after the chokes??? Let me know ASAP.

_________________
Projects: "Sortilege" - 180W Tripath Class D Mundorf upgrade amp | “Mantra” - tube MM phono preamp | "Carbon” - MM phono preamp | 180W RAW Class D amp |

Motor starts are not like motor runs, they aren't designed for contunious use, make sure the ones you use are motor runs.

That's the first mention I've heard of bias excursions due to overly large coupling caps and it's an excellent point most people overlook. This website has an article and a calculator I found useful:

http://www.pentodepress.com/home/amplif ... excursion/

I have one minor disagreement with your design philosophy. Although you can't hear 10 or 20Hz, you can feel it. That's why IMHO the low frequency response of the ears should not be used as a basis for determining the low frequency response of an audio amplifier. I can plug my ears and still "hear" (actually feel) the low frequencies through my body. That's one reason I don't care for headphones. Without real speakers there is simply no bass to feel. I would maintain that an audio system should be capable of reproducing frequencies down to 20Hz without significant attenuation to be regarded as truly hi-fi. EVERYONE can feel deep bass.

High frequency response is a different story - not everyone has the ability to hear out to 20kHz. However, I found that the 300B, being designed for audio frequencies, to be incapable of extended frequency response sufficient to cause oscillation or high frequency noise amplification problems. My amp is down about 2 or 3 dB at 20kHz without any grid stopper resistor (my hearing is only good to about 16kHz and I can't feel the treble so I don't care if the response is down by about only 1dB at my limit of hearing of 16kHz). I could be the trannys or stray capacitance creating NFB at high frequencies and not the tubes - don't know for sure - that's speculation. Or maybe my proprietary 3D wiring.

Just my 2 cents.

After reading all the work that has gone into the design of this amp I feel like I cheated on mine by just using what was an off the shelf circuit, but one that was super easy to understand, draw load lines for, and build. I used very inexpensive PIO Russian coupling caps, Hammond OTs, simple (and cheap) isolation trannys for power, SS rectification and EH brand 300Bs and it sounds SUPER!

Can't wait to see the final design (and the final cost!). One question. Would you care to share with us the results of the testing that was done on caps that you mentioned? You've got me very curious. I've been doing a lot of listening tests on caps (and have formed some opinions about the differences in sound being related to the impedance of the source and load in the case of different coupling caps), but as an engineer I also believe in test data (when used appropriately).

_________________
Stephen

An update on costs so far: $AU1500. This does include The TJ 300B/SEs, 4 X Shuguang Treasure 6SN7s, Audio Note Silver caps (X2) and a pair of EH Gold 300Bs for testing. The second pair of 6SN7s have gone into the client's preamp replacing some very nice US jobs.

I am now looking at some better filtering caps and the Mundorfs may well suite.

_________________
Projects: "Sortilege" - 180W Tripath Class D Mundorf upgrade amp | “Mantra” - tube MM phono preamp | "Carbon” - MM phono preamp | 180W RAW Class D amp |

The conclusion I reach is that for a coupling cap, if the source impedance is low (significantly lower than the impedance of the cap at a given frequency) and the load impedance is a lot higher than the cap and the source, the coupling cap may pick up more noise and send it into the next stage if the outer foil is connected to the load. If the outer foil is connected to the source, some of the induced noise will shunt through the source to ground and be attenuated. If the outer foil is connected to the load there will be a higher impedance path to shunt the noise to ground: through the cap in series with the source impedance, and that paralleled with the load impedance. The noise now has a higher impedance to ground and is not attenuated as much.

AGAIN, this assumes source and load impedances not found in typical tube amps. 26.5K is a low impedance in a tube circuit. It's more likely that the source impedance will be very high which will over shadow the impedance of the cap and render the orientation irrelevant. I guess the only reliable way to test this theory is to actually build a high gain circuit and play with the direction of the caps.

That's how this engineer sees it anyway. As always, I could be wrong. If this makes no sense I could draw the equivalent circuit to explain myself better. Interesting in any event. I never heard of this one before.

_________________
Stephen

Matt: I knew request from the customer. He wants Hammond power and OPTS. I can source Hammonds in Australia. Please recommend a model for OPT and power tranni. Also recommend a choke please.

http://evatco.com.au/trans1.htm

_________________
Projects: "Sortilege" - 180W Tripath Class D Mundorf upgrade amp | “Mantra” - tube MM phono preamp | "Carbon” - MM phono preamp | 180W RAW Class D amp |

Hmmmm....

This is a little fly in the ointment. I was just getting ready to post the final PS design. It is based on an Edcor XPWR077. But that's not what the customer wants.

So... For the output transformers, thats easy. Go with the Hammond 1630SEA. It meets all requirements and we already considered it in our design. For the primary PS choke, I've already settled on the Hammond 193J 10H choke (or the 193M or 193Q if you can't get the 'J').

The power supply transformer is another matter. Hammond only makes two transformers that meet the PS requirements for this amp. These are the 282X or 382X ( 1000v(500-0-500)@200mA, 5v@3A C.T., 6.3v@6A C.T.). And I couldn't find either of these on the web page you linked. If I need to go to the lower voltage (400-0-400) transformer it will mean an entirely new design from the ground up.

Please let me know what you want to do.

_________________
Matt
It's all about the Glass!
http://www.CascadeTubes.com
Cascade Tubes Blog

Learn from my mistake. Based on my experience I agree with your choice. I was on the fence between the 1627SEA and the 1630SEA, the difference being a lower primary impedance on the 1627SEA. The 1627SEA can also handle larger DC bias currents. You'll probably get a little less distortion with the 1630SEA though, and the difference in volume will be very slight. The customer would probably be more concerned with the distorton specs.

I used the 1627SEA and I must use the 4 ohm tap with an 8 ohm speaker. Using the 8 ohm tap loads the tubes too much. The reflected impedance to the primary of my tranny is effectively twice the rating or about 5K. 300Bs seem to like 5K. They don't seem to like 2.5K. I don't know how 3.5K will sound, but it will sound better than 2.5K for certain.

Just my observations. If I could I'd swap my 1627SEAs for 1630SEAs.

Both the 1630SEA and the 1627SEA are great trannys IMHO and either would do a great job. They weigh 11 lbs each, same as the Edcor 25 watt SE models. They Hammonds are $130 and the Edcors are $90 here in the states. Don't know if that necessarily corelates with quality. The only other ovservation I have is that Hammond OTs have a lot more laminations in the core than the Edcors. That might explain the price difference. In any event based on my experience you picked a good tranny.

_________________
Stephen